Creative Agency3.1×
qualified enquiries
Dazzle
A creative studio whose own site undersold them. New positioning, six case studies with real numbers, and motion that doesn't fight the work.
- Portfolio site
- Motion design
- Positioning
Blocked resources, duplicate URLs from filter parameters, an orphaned quarter of your site, JavaScript that renders content Google never sees. Unglamorous problems with a large effect on what ranks.
0%
Median index coverage gain
Pages indexed after fixes.
2–4
Weeks per audit
Scales with site size.
0%
Issues with URL lists
No vague 'improve site structure'.
Technical SEO is the part that either works or silently doesn't. A site can have good content and strong links while a third of its pages sit outside the index because faceted navigation generated forty thousand near-duplicate URLs and burned the crawl budget.
We crawl your site the way a search engine does, compare it against what's actually indexed, and find the gap. Then we go through the list: canonicals, redirect chains, pagination, hreflang if you're multi-region, structured data, and rendering — because a client-side-rendered page can be perfect for users and invisible in search.
Most of this work is one-off. Fix it well and it stays fixed until the site changes structurally, which is why we hand over documentation and a monitoring setup rather than selling a permanent retainer for it.
Screaming Frog crawl against Search Console coverage, plus server logs where available to see what Googlebot actually requested.
Click depth, orphan pages, and internal link distribution. Important pages should be three clicks from home, not seven.
Parameter handling, filter and sort URLs, trailing slashes, protocol and www consistency, and redirect chains collapsed.
What Google sees versus what your browser sees, checked page type by page type. Server-side rendering where it's needed.
Schema for your page types — Organization, Service, Product, Article, FAQ, LocalBusiness — validated and monitored for errors.
Field data by template, with the specific fixes for each. Overlaps with our speed work and often runs alongside it.
Full crawl, index coverage export, and log files if we can get them. Data before opinions.
Every issue documented with the affected URLs, the cause, and what it's costing you.
We implement, or write tickets specific enough that your developers can. Either works.
Re-crawl, re-render, re-test structured data, and watch index coverage recover over the following weeks.
Alerts on coverage drops and schema errors so the next regression surfaces in days, not next quarter.
Real projects, with the numbers and the parts that took longer than planned.
Creative Agency3.1×
qualified enquiries
A creative studio whose own site undersold them. New positioning, six case studies with real numbers, and motion that doesn't fight the work.
2.9×
search-to-purchase rate
3,400 outdoor SKUs, two warehouses, and a search that couldn't find a waterproof jacket by waterproof rating.
Industry context changes the brief. These are the ones whose pitfalls we already know.
Written by the people who do the work.
Crawling, indexing, duplication, structured data, and speed — in the order that matters, with the specific problems we find most often.
Read itLCP, CLS, and INP explained by cause rather than definition — and the specific fixes that moved each one on real sites, in the order we try them.
Read itWhat to do in your first ninety days, in order, with honest timelines. No tool subscriptions required for the first month.
Read itThis is the foundation layer only — crawling, indexing, structure, rendering, schema, speed. No keyword strategy, no content, no links. Plenty of clients start here because it's a one-off cost with a clear deliverable, then decide about ongoing work afterwards.
Tell us what the site needs to do. You'll get a straight answer on scope, timeline and cost — usually inside one working day.
Rather write first?hello@quesiono.com— we reply within one business day.