+88%
organic enquiries
Hartwell & Mercer
A litigation firm whose site said nothing specific. Seven practice area pages later, the enquiries are in scope.
- Practice areas
- Intake
- Compliance review
Nobody hires a law firm or an accountant on impulse. They read three sites, form an opinion about which one seems most capable, and only then pick up the phone. Your site is the reference check you don't get to attend.
5–9
Weeks, typical build
Firm site with practice area pages.
0.0×
Median enquiry quality lift
Enquiries within practice scope.
6–8
Practice area pages
Median, one per real specialism.
Professional services buying is slow and comparative. A prospect is weighing expertise, relevance to their specific situation, and whether they'd want to sit across a table from you. That's a lot of judgement to support with a site that says "trusted advisors since 1994".
What actually persuades is specificity. Not "commercial litigation" but the kinds of disputes you handle, the size of matters, the outcomes you can describe within your professional conduct rules. Named people with real backgrounds, because clients hire individuals rather than firms.
Then a clear path to a conversation. Professional services enquiries are high-value and low-volume, so the site doesn't need mass conversion tactics — it needs the right visitor to feel confident enough to make contact, and enough qualification detail that the call is worth having.
Every sector has its own set. Naming them up front is how a brief stops being a wish list.
Six firms in a market all claiming experience, integrity, and client focus. Nothing on the page helps a prospect choose, so they default to price or proximity.
Thin bios and stock photography, when the individual practitioner is the actual product. Prospects want to know who they'd be working with.
Advertising rules limit what you can claim, and firms often overcorrect into saying nothing specific at all. There's substantial room between prohibited claims and generic filler.
One page listing eight service lines competes for nothing. Prospects search for their specific issue, and that needs its own page with real depth.
A bare contact form produces calls outside your practice area and below your minimum engagement, eating partner time.
We interview partners about the work they actually do best and want more of, then write the site around that rather than around the full service list.
Real background, notable work, publications, speaking, languages, and a direct contact route. Photography specced properly even where we don't shoot it.
We work within your jurisdiction's advertising rules and find the substance that's still permitted — matter types, sectors, scale, process, and outcomes described appropriately.
Each one built around the queries prospects actually search, with the questions they ask on a first call answered before they call.
Structured intake that captures matter type, jurisdiction, and timing, routed to the right practitioner. Fewer wasted calls, better first conversations.
Not every service suits every sector. These are the ones that earn their keep in yours.
With the numbers, the timeline, and the parts that went sideways.
+88%
organic enquiries
A litigation firm whose site said nothing specific. Seven practice area pages later, the enquiries are in scope.
Creative Agency3.1×
qualified enquiries
A creative studio whose own site undersold them. New positioning, six case studies with real numbers, and motion that doesn't fight the work.
Three of us gave three different answers to what our studio was for. They wrote that down, showed it to us, and then made us pick. Uncomfortable meeting, right decision. Our enquiries are three times what they were and people arrive already knowing what we do.
Publishing three posts a week for a year and ranking for nothing is a common outcome. Here's what we do instead, and why fewer pages usually wins.
Read itMost sites that fail to convert aren't ugly. They're unclear. Here's the sequence we follow, and the specific things we measure at each step.
Read itThe map pack is where local demand lives. Here's how it's ranked, what to fix first, and the review process that quietly does most of the work.
Read itIt's a constraint we work within regularly. Bar and accountancy advertising rules generally prohibit guarantees, superlatives, and comparative claims — not describing your work. There's a lot of room between "best litigators in the state" and "we handle shareholder disputes in the $2m–$20m range." We'll draft within your rules and your compliance team reviews before publication.
Tell us the goal and the constraints. We'll tell you what it takes, what it costs, and what we'd do first.
Rather write first?hello@quesiono.com— we reply within one business day.